I wrote two blog posts about this tool. The first part is about Protected Processes concepts while the second one dicusses the bypass technique itself.
Simply run the executable without any argument and you will get a detailed help/usage.
_____ _____ __ _
| _ | _ | | _| |_ _ _____ ___
| __| __| |__| . | | | | . | version 0.4
|__| |__| |_____|___|___|_|_|_| _| by @itm4n
Dump the memory of a Protected Process Light (PPL) with a *userland* exploit
PPLdump.exe [-v] [-d] [-f] <PROC_NAME|PROC_ID> <DUMP_FILE>
PROC_NAME The name of a Process to dump
PROC_ID The ID of a Process to dump
DUMP_FILE The path of the output dump file
-v (Verbose) Enable verbose mode
-d (Debug) Enable debug mode (implies verbose)
-f (Force) Bypass DefineDosDevice error check
PPLdump.exe lsass.exe lsass.dmp
PPLdump.exe -v 720 out.dmp
Does it work on all versions of Windows?
First of all, PPLs were introduced with Windows 8.1 so older versions of Windows are obviously not supported. This project mainly targets Windows 10 (and its server editions) but I also tested it on older versions. You will find a summary table of the tests I did in the eponymous section.
How is it different from other tools?
Other PPL bypass tools usually execute arbitrary code in the Kernel through a digitally signed driver. This one is different as it involves only userland tricks and is (almost) fileless.
“Userland”, you say?!
This tool leverages a very clever trick that was initially discussed by James Forshaw in 2018 (see Credits). It involves the use of the
DefineDosDevice API function to trick the system into creating an arbitrary Known DLL entry. Since PPLs do not check the digital signature of Known DLLs, this can be later used to perform a DLL hijacking attack and execute arbitrary code inside a PPL.
Is it really “fileless”?
Although this tool performs a DLL hijacking attack as a second stage, it does not create a new DLL file on disk. Instead, it makes use of an NTFS transaction to virtually replace the content of an existing one, a technique directly inspired by the work of @_ForrestOrr (see Credits).
Can this tool cause a DoS?
Ths short answer is “no”. First, it does not involve any direct Kernel access so there is no risk of causing a BSOD from this standpoint. In the worst case scenario, the tool might fail to remove the created Known DLL entry but, this will not cause a Denial of Service. It will just stay there until the next machine reboot. As the created entry would just be a symbolic link pointing to a non-existent section, the system would eventually fall back to the default location (i.e. the
System32 folder) so it will not impact other programs running on the machine.
|Windows 10 20H2||19042||Pro||x64|
|Windows 10 20H2||19042||Pro||x86|
|Windows 10 1909||18363||Pro||x64|
|Windows 10 1507||10240||Educational||x64|
|Windows 10 1507||10240||Home||x64|
|Windows 10 1507||10240||Pro||x64|
|Windows Server 2019||17763||Standard||x64|
|Windows Server 2019||17763||Essentials||x64|
|Windows Server 2012 R2||9600||Standard||x64|
The exploit fails on fully updated Windows 8.1 / Server 2012 R2 machines. I have yet to figure out which patch caused the error.
[-] DefineDosDevice failed with error code 6 - The handle is invalid.
This Visual Studio Solution comprises two projects (the executable and a payload DLL) that need to be compiled in a specific order. Everything is pre-configured, so you just have to follow these simple instructions. The compiled payload DLL is automatically embedded into the final executable.
- Open the Solution with Visual Studio 2019.
Release / x64or
Release / x86depending on the architecture of the target machine.
Build > Build Solution.
On Windows 8.1 / Server 2012 R2, you might have to compile the binary statically.
- Right-click on the
- Go to
Multi-threaded (/MT)as the
- Build the Solution.
Source : KitPloit – PenTest Tools!